WeSearch

Implementing Soft Deletes in SQLAlchemy: Keeping Audit Trails Without Orphaning Foreign Keys in Multi-Tenant Systems

·5 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 9 views
#sqlalchemy#dataarchitecture#multitenancy
Implementing Soft Deletes in SQLAlchemy: Keeping Audit Trails Without Orphaning Foreign Keys in Multi-Tenant Systems
⚡ TL;DR · AI summary

The article discusses the implementation of soft deletes in SQLAlchemy, emphasizing the importance of maintaining audit trails and referential integrity in multi-tenant systems. It outlines the challenges faced in previous attempts and presents a refined approach using a polymorphic mixin. The proposed solution aims to prevent issues like orphaned foreign keys and schema pollution while ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements.

Key facts
Original article
DEV.to (Top)
Read full at DEV.to (Top) →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

try { if(localStorage) { let currentUser = localStorage.getItem('current_user'); if (currentUser) { currentUser = JSON.parse(currentUser); if (currentUser.id === 3944682) { document.getElementById('article-show-container').classList.add('current-user-is-article-author'); } } } } catch (e) { console.error(e); } Ugur Aslim Posted on Jun 3 • Originally published at uguraslim.com Implementing Soft Deletes in SQLAlchemy: Keeping Audit Trails Without Orphaning Foreign Keys in Multi-Tenant Systems #sqlalchemy #postgres #dataarchitecture #multitenancy Implementing Soft Deletes in SQLAlchemy: Keeping Audit Trails Without Orphaning Foreign Keys in Multi-Tenant Systems I've shipped soft deletes three times now. The first two times, I broke production.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at DEV.to (Top).

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from DEV.to (Top)