I’m a Professional Writer Who Uses a Very Controversial Tool. It’s Not As Scary As I Thought.
The author reflects on their initial skepticism towards A.I. tools like ChatGPT and Claude, ultimately finding them beneficial in their writing process. They emphasize that while A.I. has impressive capabilities, it is not a replacement for human creativity or effort. The author highlights the practical uses of A.I., particularly in transcription, which has significantly improved their workflow.
- ▪The author was initially skeptical about using A.I. tools for writing.
- ▪After experimenting with A.I., they found it helpful in reducing friction in their writing process.
- ▪The author believes that A.I. tools are valuable but do not replace the need for human creativity.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Users I’m a Professional Writer Who Uses A.I. It’s Not As Scary As I Thought. I was skeptical about ChatGPT and Claude at first. Then I started to come around—and I’m glad I did. By Alex Kirshner Follow Alex Signed Up For Email Alerts Error Signing Up For Email Alerts Close Enter your email to receive alerts for this author. Thanks for signing up! You can manage your newsletter subscriptions at any time. You're already subscribed to the aa_Alex_Kirshner newsletter. You can manage your newsletter subscriptions at any time. We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again, or manage all your newsletter subscriptions here . <div class="slate-notification--error"> Please enable javascript to sign up for newsletters.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Slate Magazine.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Slate Magazine
