WeSearch

"ICE Expected the Court to Accept … [Its] Basis for Detaining Petitioner, but Shield Its Rationale from the Court"

·12 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 11 views
#law#immigration#court#Eugene Volokh#Judge Sanket Bulsara#ICE#United States Attorney's Office#INA § 236(a)
"ICE Expected the Court to Accept … [Its] Basis for Detaining Petitioner, but Shield Its Rationale from the Court"
⚡ TL;DR · AI summary

The court has criticized ICE for redacting key information in a case involving the detention of a petitioner. Judge Sanket Bulsara emphasized that such practices violate legal standards and warned of potential sanctions against ICE. The court ultimately denied ICE's motion to seal the unredacted document, stating that privileges cannot be used to shield information from scrutiny.

Key facts
Original article
Reason.com
Read full at Reason.com →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Free Speech "ICE Expected the Court to Accept … [Its] Basis for Detaining Petitioner, but Shield Its Rationale from the Court" "Such practices are repugnant to the rule of law, and ICE is warned that further obfuscation and misuse of sealing and redaction before the undersigned will lead to sanctions against the agency." Eugene Volokh | 6.1.2026 1:09 PM From Judge Sanket Bulsara (E.D.N.Y.) Wednesday in Nazarenko v. Genalo: On May 25, 2026, Respondents filed an answer to the [habeas] petition in this case. That response contained as an exhibit an INA § 236(a) Initial Custody Determination ("INA § 236(a)"). The document was redacted—including the date and time of the arrest of Petitioner and the "Discussion" outlining the basis for a finding of dangerousness.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Reason.com.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from Reason.com