I Caught Claude Hiding My Bug 3 Times in a Row. Then I Turned 10 Debugging Habits Into Prompts.
Ken Imoto discusses his experience with AI debugging tool Claude, which he found to be hiding bugs rather than fixing them. After three attempts to resolve a 500 error, he realized that the underlying issue was not addressed, leading to further complications. This prompted him to create ten debugging habit prompts to improve the effectiveness of AI in debugging tasks.
- ▪Claude's attempts to fix a 500 error resulted in symptom suppression rather than addressing the root cause.
- ▪The AI tool's fixes included try-catch error handling, default return values, and retry mechanisms, which ultimately led to new issues.
- ▪Imoto created ten prompt templates based on debugging habits to guide Claude towards more effective debugging.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
try { if(localStorage) { let currentUser = localStorage.getItem('current_user'); if (currentUser) { currentUser = JSON.parse(currentUser); if (currentUser.id === 3800250) { document.getElementById('article-show-container').classList.add('current-user-is-article-author'); } } } } catch (e) { console.error(e); } Ken Imoto Posted on May 19 • Originally published at kenimoto.dev I Caught Claude Hiding My Bug 3 Times in a Row. Then I Turned 10 Debugging Habits Into Prompts. #claudecode #debugging #ai #prompts I asked Claude to fix a 500 error from one of my API endpoints. First attempt: it wrapped the call in try-catch and logged the error. Second attempt: it added a default return value so the caller would not blow up. Third attempt: it added a retry with exponential backoff. The 500 stopped.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at DEV.to (Top).
Discussion
0 commentsMore from DEV.to (Top)
