WeSearch

How Agile became a mis-Agile Disaster

Andrey Galkin· ·5 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 17 views
#agile methodology#software development#outsourcing#project management#corporate accountability
How Agile became a mis-Agile Disaster
⚡ TL;DR · AI summary

Agile, originally designed to enhance development performance and delivery without sacrificing quality, has devolved into what the author calls 'mis-Agile'—a rigid, dogmatic approach that undermines project continuity and accountability. The shift has been driven by outsourcing firms, a surge in low-competence IT labor, and corporate strategies to avoid responsibility by blaming decentralized teams. Despite its original emphasis on skilled professionals, modern Agile often relies on junior staff in flat, poorly managed structures.

Key facts
Original article
Medium · Andrey Galkin
Read full at Medium →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

How Agile became a mis-Agile DisasterAndrey Galkin5 min read·Just now--ListenShareBack in the end of the 90’s and start of the 00’s, Agile was an approach to cut corners for highly professional activities to improve development performance and delivery times without sacrificing quality. Somehow, the true Agile bias of the manifesto and the principles turned into dogmas of complete rejection of less favorable values. Let’s call it mis-Agile.Mis-Agile’s main problem used to be and remains project continuity upon staff rotation, including up- and down-scaling. Therefore, even in the early 10’s, large US corporations were not accepting pure Agile as a replacement for project and program management.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Medium.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from Medium