‘Historical value? How many Canadians would even recognize a photo of 24 Sussex?’ Letters to the editor for May 18
The article discusses various opinions on the renovation of 24 Sussex Drive, the official residence of the Prime Minister of Canada. Some letters advocate for its restoration as a national landmark, while others question the ethics of paying for plasma donations and the disparity in wages between trades and childcare workers. The discussion highlights the need for a holistic review of government-funded residences and the importance of equitable investment in various sectors.
- ▪Supporters of the renovation of 24 Sussex argue it could become a national attraction and educational site.
- ▪Critics raise concerns about the ethics of paying for plasma donations and the implications for public health.
- ▪There is a call for equal investment in early childhood education to address wage disparities between trades and childcare workers.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Open this photo in gallery:The residence at 24 Sussex Drive in Ottawa in October, 2015.Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian PressShareSave for laterPlease log in to bookmark this story.Log InCreate Free AccountBlood moneyRe “Canadians’ plasma is now a liquid asset. Is that ethical? I donated to learn more” (May 14): I am horrified that Canadians are being paid to donate plasma in our country.What is next? Payment for organs? And if so, how will the trade of human body parts for cash end?Margot Todd VictoriaThere may be an ethical argument against paid blood donation because the profit motive encourages cutting corners on safety, or because a fully voluntary system appeals to a virtuous sense of community.But any argument against payment itself is hypocritical.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The Globe and Mail.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from The Globe and Mail
