Here’s what was on the jury’s list for a decision.
Jury Rejects Musk’s Claims Against OpenAIElon Musk accused OpenAI of putting commercial gain over the public good, but jurors ruled that the statute of limitations had expired. Musk’s credibility and his effort to become a serious competitor in the artificial intelligence race.The nine-member jury, deliberating for less than two hours in U.S. District Court in Oakland, Calif., found that Mr.
- ▪Jury Rejects Musk’s Claims Against OpenAIElon Musk accused OpenAI of putting commercial gain over the public good, but jurors ruled that the statute of limitations had expired.
- ▪Musk’s credibility and his effort to become a serious competitor in the artificial intelligence race.The nine-member jury, deliberating for less than two hours in U.S.
- ▪District Court in Oakland, Calif., found that Mr.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Jury Rejects Musk’s Claims Against OpenAIElon Musk accused OpenAI of putting commercial gain over the public good, but jurors ruled that the statute of limitations had expired. Mr. Musk said he planned to appeal, skewering the decision and the judge on X.Published May 18, 2026Updated June 2, 2026Share full articleElon Musk and Sam Altman spent days in court over OpenAI.Eric Lee/The New York Times; Mike Kai Chen for The New York Times !function(){var e="gps_module_impressions",s="gps_suppress_module",t=new URLSearchParams(window.location.search),o="1"===t.get("gps_debug")?function(e,s){console.log("[gps]",e,void 0!==s?s:"")}:function(){};if(o("version",16),(document.documentElement.lang||"").toLowerCase().startsWith("es")&&(document.body.classList.add("gps-lang-es"),o("language:…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at NYT — Technology.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from NYT — Technology
