Help mom hit her reading goals with this deal on a new Kindle Paperwhite
With Mother's Day approaching, the Kindle Paperwhite is highlighted as a practical and thoughtful gift for book-loving moms. Priced at $134.99 (down from $159.99), it features a 16GB storage capacity, glare-free waterproof display, adjustable warm light, and up to 12 weeks of battery life. The deal includes three months of Kindle Unlimited for free, offering access to thousands of e-books. Other Kindle models like the Colorsoft and Paperwhite Signature Edition are also featured at discounted prices.
- ▪The Kindle Paperwhite is available for $134.99, a $25 discount from its original price of $159.99.
- ▪It has a 16GB storage capacity, a glare-free waterproof screen, and an adjustable warm light for comfortable reading in any lighting.
- ▪The device offers up to 12 weeks of battery life on a single charge and is ideal for readers who enjoy books on the go.
- ▪The purchase includes a free three-month trial of Kindle Unlimited, giving access to thousands of e-books, audiobooks, and magazines.
- ▪Alternative models like the Kindle Colorsoft and Kindle Paperwhite Signature Edition are also on sale with enhanced features.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Shopping Help mom hit her reading goals with this deal on a new Kindle Paperwhite By Angela Tricarico Published April 28, 2026, 7:00 p.m. ET New York Post Composite New York Post may be compensated and/or receive an affiliate commission if you click or buy through our links. Featured pricing is subject to change. Mother’s Day is less than two weeks away, but if you haven’t found a gift yet, don’t panic — there’s still plenty of time. If you haven’t thought of a gift yet, might we suggest the Kindle Paperwhite? As an e-reader tester, the Paperwhite is the model I find myself recommending more often than any of the others. It’s the best model for most readers, including my own mom, to whom I gifted one a few years ago.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at New York Post.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from New York Post
