WeSearch

Google Appeals Antitrust Ruling, Says Apple Chose Its Search Engine 'Fair and Square'

5 sources covered this ⚠ Left-only compare →
Coverage of the appeal varies among outlets. The Verge emphasizes Google's argument that it won business "fair and square," framing the appeal as a defense of competitive practices. In contrast, the New York Times focuses more on the…
·2 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 20 views
#google#antitrust#apple#search engine#lawsuit
Google Appeals Antitrust Ruling, Says Apple Chose Its Search Engine 'Fair and Square'
⚡ TL;DR · AI summary

Google has filed an appeal against a 2024 antitrust ruling that found it violated laws by paying to be the default search engine on iPhones. The company argues that its success is due to competition and innovation rather than any unfair practices. Google is seeking to overturn the remedies imposed by the court and exclude generative AI companies from receiving its search data.

Key facts
Original article
MacRumors
Read full at MacRumors →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Google Appeals Antitrust Ruling, Says Apple Chose Its Search Engine 'Fair and Square'Friday May 22, 2026 1:18 pm PDT by Juli CloverGoogle today appealed a 2024 ruling that found it violated antitrust law by paying to be the default search engine on iPhones. In a filing with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Google said the district court made an error when concluding that Google's search success was due to anything other than competition on merit. Google suggested it surpassed competition through better innovation, more investments, and "just working harder," which is why Apple chose Google Search as its default search option on Apple devices.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at MacRumors.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from MacRumors