Gold vs CDs vs stocks: When gold helps (and when it doesn’t)
Stocks, certificates of deposit (CDs), and gold each play distinct roles in an investment portfolio, offering growth, yield, and protection against economic uncertainty respectively. CDs have become more attractive since 2022 due to higher interest rates, while gold serves as a non-correlated hedge against systemic risks like inflation or currency debasement. Diversification across these assets helps balance risk and return, aligning with modern portfolio theory principles.
- ▪Stocks are generally seen as a proxy for economic growth and offer high return potential, though they come with higher volatility.
- ▪Certificates of deposit (CDs) have regained popularity since 2022 due to rising interest rates, with yields exceeding 4% on 1- to 5-year terms.
- ▪Gold acts as an 'insurance policy' in a portfolio, protecting against unknown economic risks and currency debasement, according to Adam Bergman of IRA Financial.
- ▪Harry Markowitz, known as the father of modern portfolio theory, emphasized diversification as a key strategy to manage investment risk.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Personal Finance Gold vs CDs vs stocks: When gold helps (and when it doesn’t) By Will Kenton Published May 4, 2026, 5:15 a.m. ET NY Post Design New York Post may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and/or when you make a purchase. Harry Markowitz, the economist often credited as the father of modern portfolio theory, is reputed to have said, “Diversification is the only free lunch in finance.” Diversification does a lot of work in your portfolio and is still one of the investment basics new savers learn. Many 20th-century investing assumptions have been tested in recent years, but the underlying principle behind diversification remains sound. Buying assets whose values aren’t correlated hedges against risk.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at New York Post.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from New York Post
