Generative AI's Existential Cringe
The article discusses the negative perception surrounding generative AI in the art world, particularly highlighted by a recent exhibit by actor Jake Wood. His painting of Sir David Attenborough faced backlash due to its AI-generated elements, leading to the cancellation of the exhibit. The author argues that generative AI is viewed as toxic, impacting the reception of artworks even when the technology is used minimally.
- ▪Jake Wood's Icons series included a controversial painting of Sir David Attenborough that featured AI-generated imagery.
- ▪The exhibit was canceled due to public backlash and accusations of abusive behavior.
- ▪Generative AI is perceived negatively in the art community, affecting how artworks are received regardless of their quality.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Generative AI's Existential CringeAI isn't cool, and it never will be. Matthew HughesMay 18, 202651SharePhoto by Ewa Gillen on UnsplashIt’s been a while. Apologies for the lack of output on my end. It… has not been the best few months. Writing has been tough, as demonstrated by my hard drive filled with half-completed, unpublished newsletters. I’m going to get back into the swing of things, starting with this. Jake Wood is, by all accounts, a successful actor, having performed the role of Max Branning in the British soap opera Eastenders for the past two decades or so.At least, that’s what Wikipedia tells me. If you’re American, you probably know him as the Geico Gecko.Anyway, the reason why I bring him up has nothing to do with his performances on stage and screen, but rather, on canvas.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Hacker News (AI / LLM).
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Hacker News (AI / LLM)
