WeSearch

Formalized, Reviewed, Triaged — A Practitioner's Account, Part II

·13 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 5 views
#software development#ai#methodology#documentation#testing
Formalized, Reviewed, Triaged — A Practitioner's Account, Part II
⚡ TL;DR · AI summary

The article details the formalization of a software development methodology that evolved from an individual practice into a structured, document-driven system. Two new packages were successfully developed using this formalized process, followed by a review phase that uncovered over a hundred non-critical findings. The process revealed a gap: the review work type, though essential, remains undocumented and operates outside the formal system.

Key facts
Original article
DEV Community
Read full at DEV Community →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

try { if(localStorage) { let currentUser = localStorage.getItem('current_user'); if (currentUser) { currentUser = JSON.parse(currentUser); if (currentUser.id === 3877354) { document.getElementById('article-show-container').classList.add('current-user-is-article-author'); } } } } catch (e) { console.error(e); } Kemal Deniz Teket Posted on May 3 Formalized, Reviewed, Triaged — A Practitioner's Account, Part II #ai #testing #typescript #markdown §0 — Hook The work-pool schema that runs the paragraf project names three work types: spec, package, and issue-bucket. Only two of the three have a defined process. The title word is earned — the findings were triaged. The process that did the triaging is not yet written down.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at DEV Community.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from DEV Community