England delaying World Cup trip to Mexico City over spying fears
World Cup 2026 Soccer England delaying World Cup trip to Mexico City over spying fears By Christian Arnold Published July 2, 2026, 8:32 p.m. Add The New York Post on Google England is not taking any chances ahead of their Round of 16 match against Mexico, opting to remain in their base camp in Kansas City out of an abundance of caution in order to keep their tactical preparation well guarded. Both The Times and the Daily Mail reported Thursday that Thomas Tuchel decided his club would not leave for Mexico City ahead of their showdown with Mexico on Sunday until Friday, with both outlets indicating at least part of the decision was based on concerns over being spied on.
- ▪World Cup 2026 Soccer England delaying World Cup trip to Mexico City over spying fears By Christian Arnold Published July 2, 2026, 8:32 p.m.
- ▪Add The New York Post on Google England is not taking any chances ahead of their Round of 16 match against Mexico, opting to remain in their base camp in Kansas City out of an abundance of caution in order to keep their tactical preparation
- ▪Both The Times and the Daily Mail reported Thursday that Thomas Tuchel decided his club would not leave for Mexico City ahead of their showdown with Mexico on Sunday until Friday, with both outlets indicating at least part of the decision w
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
World Cup 2026 Soccer England delaying World Cup trip to Mexico City over spying fears By Christian Arnold Published July 2, 2026, 8:32 p.m. ET (function() { var overlay = document.getElementById("nyp-player-lcp-overlay"); if (!overlay) { return; } function hideOverlay() { overlay.remove(); } function afterDCL() { requestAnimationFrame(hideOverlay); } if (document.readyState === "loading") { document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", afterDCL, { once: true }); } else { afterDCL(); } })(); See more of our coverage in your search results.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at New York Post.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from New York Post
