Elon Musk said Sam Altman “stole” a non-profit — but the trial showed he had similar aims
Elon Musk's lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft was dismissed by a jury, highlighting the weaknesses in his case. The trial revealed Musk's own involvement in benefiting from OpenAI's resources for his Tesla projects. Legal experts noted that Musk's actions may contradict his claims of a breach of charitable trust.
- ▪The jury rejected Musk's lawsuit, indicating it was weak due to the delay in filing.
- ▪Musk's case centered on accusations of breach of charitable trust and unjust enrichment by OpenAI's founders.
- ▪Testimony revealed Musk had OpenAI researchers assist Tesla without reimbursement, raising legal concerns.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
The jury’s speedy decision to reject Elon Musk’s lawsuit against the other founders of OpenAI and Microsoft confirmed what we saw in the courtroom: Musk’s case was a weak one, in part because he waited so long to file it. Watching the closing arguments last week, OpenAI’s attorneys detailed point-by-point how the law was on their client’s side, while the plaintiffs team focused on Sam Altman’s apparent lack of credibility and expressed disbelief that anyone would disagree with Musk’s accusations. The final effect was that, after the verdict, some found it hard to believe Musk had lost — including the man himself.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at TechCrunch.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from TechCrunch
