‘Dynamite’ speech sets one High Court judge against another
High Court Justice Robert Beech-Jones delivered a controversial speech criticizing efforts to influence the Australian judiciary with conservative ideologies. He accused a group of conservative lawyers, known as the Samuel Griffith Society, of attempting to import US-style court stacking. The speech has sparked debate among legal circles, with some describing it as 'dynamite.'
- ▪Justice Robert Beech-Jones criticized the Samuel Griffith Society for its conservative agenda in a recent speech.
- ▪He claimed the society aims to promote US-style court stacking in Australia.
- ▪Beech-Jones's speech has drawn attention and sparked discussions among legal professionals.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","dateModified":"2026-05-29T08:53:28Z","datePublished":"2026-05-29T08:53:28Z","description":"A judge has taken aim at people he says want to import “US-style court stacking” to Australia.","headline":"‘Dynamite’ speech sets one High Court judge against another","keywords":"High Court of Australia, Justice, Mark Dreyfus, Courts, For subscribers","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Michael Bachelard","jobTitle":"Senior writer, The…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The Sydney Morning Herald.