WeSearch

Court Finds AI Hallucinations in Filing by Former State Senate Candidate

·8 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 9 views
#law#artificial intelligence#legal ethics#court ruling#sanctions#Tricia S. Lindsay#Sai Malena Jimenez-Fogarty#Gabriel W. Gorenstein#S.D.N.Y.#Jimenez-Fogarty v. Fogarty
Court Finds AI Hallucinations in Filing by Former State Senate Candidate
⚡ TL;DR · AI summary

A former New York State Senate candidate and attorney, Tricia S. Lindsay, was sanctioned $2,500 by a federal court for submitting legal briefs containing numerous fabricated case citations. The court found that the citations were entirely made up and could not be attributed to simple errors or mischaracterizations. Lindsay failed to provide a credible explanation for the false citations, despite being ordered to show cause.

Key facts
Original article
Reason.com
Read full at Reason.com →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

AI in Court Court Finds AI Hallucinations in Filing by Former State Senate Candidate Eugene Volokh | 5.2.2026 8:01 AM From Jimenez-Fogarty v. Fogarty, decided Wednesday by Magistrate Gabriel W. Gorenstein (S.D.N.Y.); Lindsay had run for the N.Y. State Senate in 2024: Tricia S. Lindsay, attorney for plaintiff Sai Malena Jimenez-Fogarty, responded to two motions to dismiss by filing a pair of memoranda of law that cited to numerous nonexistent cases. In response, the Court ordered Lindsay to show cause why she should not be sanctioned for her misleading filings. Upon consideration of Lindsay's response to these orders, we find that she should be sanctioned in the amount of $2,500.00 …. [T]wo briefs were signed by Lindsay, and each contained a number of fabricated citations.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Reason.com.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from Reason.com