WeSearch

Chris Bowen says he has made it ‘crystal clear’ to BHP and other big polluters they must cut emissions onsite

https://www.theguardian.com/profile/christopher-knaus,https://www.theguardian.com/profile/adam-morton,https://www.theguardian.com/profile/dan-jervis-bardy· ·5 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 19 views
#climate change#emissions#bhp#policy#australia#Chris Bowen#BHP#Western Australia#Albanese Labor government#Greens
Chris Bowen says he has made it ‘crystal clear’ to BHP and other big polluters they must cut emissions onsite
⚡ TL;DR · AI summary

Australia's climate change minister, Chris Bowen, has emphasized the need for major polluters like BHP to reduce emissions onsite. This statement follows revelations that BHP has delayed significant climate initiatives and backtracked on its commitments. Bowen insists that the safeguard mechanism still applies to BHP and expects compliance from all large emitters.

Key facts
Original article
World news | The Guardian · https://www.theguardian.com/profile/christopher-knaus,https://www.theguardian.com/profile/adam-morton,https://www.theguardian.com/profile/dan-jervis-bardy
Read full at World news | The Guardian →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Chris Bowen says he wants to see all large emitters reducing emissions onsite: ‘That applies to BHP and everyone else.’ Photograph: Lukas Coch/EPAView image in fullscreenChris Bowen says he wants to see all large emitters reducing emissions onsite: ‘That applies to BHP and everyone else.’ Photograph: Lukas Coch/EPAThe BHP filesBHPChris Bowen says he has made it ‘crystal clear’ to BHP and other big polluters they must cut emissions onsiteMining giant’s backsliding on climate commitments due to ‘weakness’ of policy, Kate Chaney says Adam Morton: Big Mining gets a $4bn tax break to use fossil fuel.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at World news | The Guardian.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments