‘Charlie’s Angels’ star Kate Jackson ‘annoyed’ she didn’t see a dime from show merch
Kate Jackson, star of the 1970s TV series 'Charlie’s Angels,' expressed annoyance that she did not receive any revenue from the show's extensive merchandise, despite its global success. She acknowledged the show's lasting impact, noting it has remained continuously on television since its 1976 debut. In contrast, co-star Jaclyn Smith viewed the show as a career blessing that led to numerous business opportunities.
- ▪Kate Jackson played Sabrina Duncan in 'Charlie’s Angels,' a hit series that premiered in 1976 and ran for five seasons.
- ▪The show generated a wide range of merchandise featuring the actresses' likenesses, from dolls to lunchboxes, without compensating the cast.
- ▪Jackson stated she was annoyed about not being paid for merchandise, while Jaclyn Smith said the show opened doors for her in branding and fashion.
- ▪Smith credited 'Charlie’s Angels' for giving her a successful post-acting career in design and skincare products.
- ▪The actresses were honored at the 2026 Paley Honors Spring Gala, marking the show’s upcoming 50th anniversary.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
TV exclusive ‘Charlie’s Angels’ star Kate Jackson ‘annoyed’ she didn’t see a dime from show merch By Nicki Gostin Published May 17, 2026, 9:00 a.m. ET Kate Jackson is none too pleased with the finances surrounding “Charlie’s Angels.” Jackson played Sabrina Duncan in the iconic television series, one of three former police women turned private investigators who worked for an unseen boss named Charlie. The show, which debuted in 1976 and is celebrating its 50th anniversary in September, ran for five seasons, was a massive global hit and ushered in the phrase “jiggle television” due to its often skimpy costumes. It also spun off a dizzying array of merchandise, including puzzles, lunchboxes, posters and dolls, all adorned with the actress’ likeness.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Page Six.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Page Six
