WeSearch

Catching Invisible Degradation in a Go OSS Project: 7 CI Checks Over 11 Months

·7 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 14 views
#go#devops#opensource
Catching Invisible Degradation in a Go OSS Project: 7 CI Checks Over 11 Months
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

The article discusses the implementation of a CI harness over 11 months to address gaps in a Go open-source project. It highlights the importance of various checks added to prevent issues such as unnoticed regressions and broken binaries. The author emphasizes that each check was introduced in response to specific failures encountered during development.

Key facts
Original article
DEV.to (Top)
Read full at DEV.to (Top) →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

try { if(localStorage) { let currentUser = localStorage.getItem('current_user'); if (currentUser) { currentUser = JSON.parse(currentUser); if (currentUser.id === 3422958) { document.getElementById('article-show-container').classList.add('current-user-is-article-author'); } } } } catch (e) { console.error(e); } Kazu Posted on May 20 Catching Invisible Degradation in a Go OSS Project: 7 CI Checks Over 11 Months #github #go #devops #opensource Three days after a release, an issue arrived: "The install command doesn't work." A module path change in that release had broken go install. My test suite had passed. My local build had passed. CI had passed. The binary was broken anyway, and I found out from a user report, not from a check. That was the first gap.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at DEV.to (Top).

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from DEV.to (Top)