C# Networking Deep Dive with io_uring part 6 - Numbers
The article discusses benchmarks for C# networking using io_uring. It compares various configurations for read and write operations, including the use of inline continuations and thread pools. Performance metrics are provided for synchronous and asynchronous workloads under different conditions.
- ▪Benchmarks were conducted using io_uring read and write operations with different configurations.
- ▪The tests were performed on a system with an i9 14900k processor and 64GB of RAM.
- ▪Performance metrics included requests per second and latency for both synchronous and asynchronous workloads.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
try { if(localStorage) { let currentUser = localStorage.getItem('current_user'); if (currentUser) { currentUser = JSON.parse(currentUser); if (currentUser.id === 3673839) { document.getElementById('article-show-container').classList.add('current-user-is-article-author'); } } } } catch (e) { console.error(e); } Diogo Martins Posted on May 27 C# Networking Deep Dive with io_uring part 6 - Numbers #csharp #linux #networking #performance For part 6 let's do some benchmarks; What is going to be benchmarked io_uring read+write with IVTS reactor inline continuations (RunAsynchrounousContinuation = false) io_uring read+write without IVTS reactor inline continuations(threadpool) (RunAsynchrounousContinuation = true) io_uring read + libc send write without IVTS reactor inline…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at DEV.to (Top).
Discussion
0 commentsMore from DEV.to (Top)
