Breaking the Two-Party System
The article discusses the structural reasons behind America's two-party system and how it limits voter choice. Political scientist Lee Drutman suggests that shifting to proportional representation could allow for the emergence of viable third parties. This change could enable voters to have more options and better representation in Congress.
- ▪America's two-party system is a result of its electoral structure, not a reflection of voter preference.
- ▪Proportional representation could allow third parties to gain seats in Congress by requiring only a fraction of the vote.
- ▪Currently, voters often feel compelled to choose between the two major parties, limiting their options.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
new video loaded: Breaking the Two-Party SystemtranscriptBacktranscriptBreaking the Two-Party SystemAmerica’s two-party system isn’t an accident — it is a direct result of our electoral structure. The political scientist Lee Drutman tells the Opinion columnist Ezra Klein how shifting to proportional representation could pave the way for viable third parties and give voters more choices.We are not a two-party system in America by accident. We are a two-party system in America by structure. And proportional representation, at least at the House level, might break that structure. So why is proportional representation friendlier to a multi-party system. Why would it break the two-party system compared to what we have now.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at NYT — Opinion.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from NYT — Opinion
