WeSearch

Benchmark: GitHub Desktop 3.0 vs. GitKraken 10.0 for Managing Large Kubernetes 1.32 Repos

·18 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 2 views
Benchmark: GitHub Desktop 3.0 vs. GitKraken 10.0 for Managing Large Kubernetes 1.32 Repos

Managing a 112,000-file Kubernetes 1.32 monorepo shouldn’t take 47 seconds to load a commit history....

Original article
DEV.to (Top)
Read full at DEV.to (Top) →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

try { if(localStorage) { let currentUser = localStorage.getItem('current_user'); if (currentUser) { currentUser = JSON.parse(currentUser); if (currentUser.id === 3900225) { document.getElementById('article-show-container').classList.add('current-user-is-article-author'); } } } } catch (e) { console.error(e); } ANKUSH CHOUDHARY JOHAL Posted on Apr 29 • Originally published at johal.in Benchmark: GitHub Desktop 3.0 vs. GitKraken 10.0 for Managing Large Kubernetes 1.32 Repos #benchmark #github #desktop #gitkraken Managing a 112,000-file Kubernetes 1.32 monorepo shouldn’t take 47 seconds to load a commit history. But for 68% of senior DevOps engineers we surveyed, that’s exactly the pain point they hit with legacy Git GUIs.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at DEV.to (Top).

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from DEV.to (Top)