Barney Frank’s Second Coming Out
Barney Frank, the 86-year-old former Democratic congressman, is speaking out in his final days against what he sees as left-wing extremism undermining the Democratic Party. In his forthcoming book, he criticizes positions on open borders, defunding police, and cultural issues like transgender participation in sports as alienating voters. Drawing parallels to his 1987 coming out as gay, Frank aims to empower fellow liberals to resist ideological conformity.
- ▪Barney Frank argues that far-left positions on cultural issues have created a 'vote-repelling platform' for Democrats.
- ▪He claims that progressives have imposed litmus tests on controversial topics, hurting the party's broader electoral chances.
- ▪Frank contends that economic populism has gained public support, but cultural extremism has undermined that progress.
- ▪Despite his progressive legacy, Frank warns that the Democratic Party is being defined by ideas the public is not ready to accept.
- ▪His criticism has drawn backlash from some on the left, who dismiss his views as out of step with the party’s future.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
IdeasBarney Frank’s Second Coming OutIn his final act, the liberal stalwart wants to save his party from ideologues.By James KirchickMelissa Golden / ReduxMay 17, 2026, 8 AM ET ShareSave Barney Frank might not draw a connection between his coming out as gay nearly four decades ago and his coming out against left-wing dogmatism in the Democratic Party today. But the parallel is unmistakable: The 86-year-old former Democratic congressman from Massachusetts is shining a light on a sensitive subject that many people wish he would keep quiet about.In his forthcoming book, The Hard Path to Unity: Why We Must Reform the Left to Rescue Democracy, Frank contends that left-wingers have saddled his party with a “vote-repelling platform” of open borders, defunded police departments, and “the rule of…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The Atlantic.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from The Atlantic
