Ask HN: How do you feel about AI assisted blogging?
The article reflects on the role of AI in blogging, suggesting that all writing inherently builds on prior work, making AI-assisted content a natural extension of this process. The author argues that unedited AI output may feel impersonal, but integrating it with personal voice and experience improves its quality. Ultimately, the piece concludes that true innovation is rare and cannot be fully generated by AI, so readers should focus on value rather than origin.
- ▪All writing, according to the author, is influenced by previous works and perspectives.
- ▪AI-generated content is seen as a modern form of reusing and rephrasing existing knowledge.
- ▪The author recommends blending AI output with personal experience to make it more relatable and human.
- ▪True innovation is considered extremely rare and not something AI can independently produce.
- ▪The central message is that enjoyment and learning from content matter more than its source.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
I have personally pondered and accepted the fact that anything I have to say, written or otherwise, is a result of others' work no matter how much I want to believe I have a truly unique perspective. I read a lot of blog articles, and it's truly rare that I don't recognize either borrowed words or concepts even though I enjoy reading the content.I admit that AI generated writing is a little strange unedited. Putting that output into a writer's voice with personal experience is always going to help to humanize it and make it more readable.But the reality is that AI is just the next phase of borrowing and rehashing of older materials and concepts--just like reading an encyclopedia or Wikipedia article and then putting those rehashed words into an essay.My suggestion is that as long as you…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Ycombinator.