ArXiv Will Ban You for Hallucinated References
ArXiv.org has announced stricter policies regarding the use of AI-generated citations, specifically targeting 'hallucinated' references. Authors who submit papers with non-existent citations or careless commentary may face a one-year ban from the platform. After the ban, they will be on probation and must have their next papers accepted by peer-reviewed journals before posting again.
- ▪ArXiv.org will ban authors for one year if their papers contain hallucinated citations.
- ▪During the probation period, authors must have their subsequent papers accepted by peer-reviewed journals before submitting to arXiv.
- ▪The platform aims to maintain a useful environment for scientists by minimizing spam and irrelevant content.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
ArXiv Will Ban You for Hallucinated References 6 Replies Thomas Dietterich, Chair of the Computer Science section of the preprint server arXiv.org, recently clarified the site’s policies towards “hallucinated” citations and other signs of careless use of AI in a post on X. If your paper contains a citation to a paper that doesn’t actually exist, or has other signs you didn’t read it before posting like leftover commentary (the example he gave was “here is a 200 word summary; would you like me to make any changes?”), then you can get banned from the arXiv for one year. Even after that year you’d be on a kind of “probation”, and would need to show that your next few papers had been accepted by peer-reviewed journals first before posting them.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at 4 gravitons.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from 4 gravitons
