ArXiv will ban submitters of AI-generated slop for one year
ArXiv has implemented a new policy banning submitters of AI-generated content that does not meet scholarly standards for one year. This decision aims to address the increasing presence of flawed AI-generated submissions in scientific literature. Authors will be held accountable for any inappropriate content, and future submissions will require peer review before being accepted.
- ▪ArXiv will impose a one-year ban on authors who submit inappropriate AI-generated content.
- ▪All authors are responsible for the content of their submissions, including AI-generated material.
- ▪Future manuscripts from banned authors will only be accepted after undergoing peer review.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Rejected Send the arXiv AI-generated slop, get a yearlong vacation from submissions One of the site’s moderators described the new policy on social media. John Timmer – May 15, 2026 2:25 pm | 61 Credit: Getty Images Credit: Getty Images Text settings Story text Size Small Standard Large Width * Standard Wide Links Standard Orange * Subscribers only Learn more Minimize to nav AI-generated slop has shown up everywhere, including in the peer-reviewed literature. Fake citations, unedited prompt responses, and nonsensical diagrams have all slipped past editors and peer reviewers, and it’s not always clear if there are any consequences for the people responsible.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Ars Technica.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Ars Technica
