WeSearch

Apple Silicon costs more than OpenRouter

·2 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 12 views
#ai inference#apple silicon#cloud computing#openrouter#machine learning
Apple Silicon costs more than OpenRouter
⚡ TL;DR · AI summary

Running AI inference locally on Apple Silicon is more expensive than using OpenRouter, with costs dominated by hardware depreciation rather than electricity. Under typical usage, Apple Silicon can cost around three times more per million tokens compared to OpenRouter, which also offers faster inference speeds. Despite higher costs and slower performance, consumer devices like the M5 MacBook Pro can still run models approaching the performance level of advanced cloud-based systems.

Key facts
Original article
Williamangel
Read full at Williamangel →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Offline Agentic Coding part 3: Apple Silicon costs more than OpenRouter. Published 2026-05-17 Apple silicon costs more than OpenRouter. At ~50-100 watts under load, and ~$0.20 per kWh, my M5 MacbookPro will cost a few cents per hour. Accelerated depreciation (if any) from shortening the lifespan of the device will be more expensive than the electricity. At a few tens of tokens per second this works out to ammortized costs of ~$1.50 per million tokens. Openrouter for comparable models is 1/3rd the price and ~2x the speed. Electricity In Northern Virginia my last electricity bill worked out to $0.18 per kilowatt hour. Let's round up to $0.20 per kWh. EIA has average residential costs for 2025 at $0.1730 per kWh in the US.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Williamangel.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from Williamangel