Andrew Tate’s legal claim against prosecutors’ refusal to name alleged victims thrown out
Lawyers for the CPS said the decision to withhold the names was made due to fears the Tates could identify the alleged victims online. Photograph: Inquam Photos/Eduard Vinatoru/ReutersView image in fullscreenLawyers for the CPS said the decision to withhold the names was made due to fears the Tates could identify the alleged victims online.
- ▪Lawyers for the CPS said the decision to withhold the names was made due to fears the Tates could identify the alleged victims online.
- ▪Photograph: Inquam Photos/Eduard Vinatoru/ReutersView image in fullscreenLawyers for the CPS said the decision to withhold the names was made due to fears the Tates could identify the alleged victims online.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Lawyers for the CPS said the decision to withhold the names was made due to fears the Tates could identify the alleged victims online. Photograph: Inquam Photos/Eduard Vinatoru/ReutersView image in fullscreenLawyers for the CPS said the decision to withhold the names was made due to fears the Tates could identify the alleged victims online. Photograph: Inquam Photos/Eduard Vinatoru/ReutersUK newsAndrew Tate’s legal claim against prosecutors’ refusal to name alleged victims thrown outTate and his brother argued CPS acted unlawfully by not telling them the names before they return to UKPress AssociationFri 26 Jun 2026 07.29 EDTLast modified on Fri 26 Jun 2026 07.53 EDTSharePrefer the Guardian on GoogleA high court judge has thrown out Andrew and Tristan Tate’s attempt to bring a legal…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at the Guardian.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from the Guardian
