'An Iranian diplomatic victory over Trump would be celebrated amid ruins'
The article discusses Donald Trump's approach to Iran, contrasting it with Barack Obama's strategy of strategic patience. Trump's impulsive tactics have led to a perceived Iranian victory, as the regime has managed to maintain its stability despite challenges. This situation highlights the effectiveness of the Iranian leadership in navigating the current geopolitical landscape.
- ▪Donald Trump has adopted a strategy of impulsiveness in contrast to Barack Obama's strategic patience.
- ▪The Iranian regime has shown resilience and adaptability despite facing significant challenges.
- ▪Recent developments suggest that Trump has been forced to cancel negotiations, indicating a setback in his approach to Iran.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Donald Trump, not known for his taste for theories, seems to be forging a new concept with the war he launched against Iran: strategic impatience. The president of the United States often defines himself in contrast to his first Democratic predecessor, Barack Obama. Obama's final national security strategy in 2015 argued that the challenges facing the US, many of which remain relevant today (Russian aggression in Ukraine, rivalry with China), required "strategic patience and persistence." Critics, including within the Democratic Party, saw this as a recipe for passivity. In their eyes, his refusal to send weapons to Kyiv was the most obvious example – a dramatic decision in retrospect.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Le Monde (EN).
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Le Monde (EN)
