AI keeps inventing fake cases. Lawyers keep citing them
Lawyers in the U.S. are facing sanctions for citing fake cases generated by AI, highlighting a growing issue of misplaced trust in technology. Despite warnings, some attorneys continue to submit documents with AI-hallucinated citations, leading to judicial reprimands. Experts warn that as AI becomes more integrated into professional work, the consequences of such errors could become increasingly severe.
- ▪The Alabama Supreme Court sanctioned an attorney for filing briefs with AI-generated citations to nonexistent cases.
- ▪A database has recorded over 1,400 instances of courts addressing AI errors in legal filings over the past three years.
- ▪Experts note that people often trust AI's outputs despite knowing the technology can produce false information.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
May 22, 20265 min read Add Us On GoogleAdd SciAmAI keeps inventing fake cases. Lawyers keep citing themThe trend of attorneys getting caught citing AI-hallucinated cases points to a broader problem: instead of checking AI’s work, people keep trusting itBy Steven Melendez edited by Eric SullivanJudges around the U.S. have sanctioned lawyers for filing court documents that include fake AI-generated citations. John Pendygraft/AFP via Getty ImagesIn April the Alabama Supreme Court sanctioned an attorney who had filed legal briefs laden with inaccurate citations generated by AI, including numerous references to cases that did not exist.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Scientific American.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Scientific American
