AI influencer salaries revealed, with one making $9k-a-month — but which has he most personality?
AI influencers are generating significant monthly income through brand partnerships, with some earning up to $9,000 per month. Creators behind these digital personalities manage them as full-time jobs, crafting aspirational lifestyles and content across social platforms. While the avatars appear to travel and engage in glamorous activities, the human creators often do not experience these settings firsthand.
- ▪Mia Metaverse, an AI influencer created by Clarissa Mansbridge, earns $4,500 per month through brand deals with companies like Fashion Nova and Kayali.
- ▪AI influencer RoRo Castillos, created by Arturo Bustillos, earns $1,500 monthly and promotes LGBTQ+ representation in the music space.
- ▪The creators of AI influencers manage all aspects of their digital personas, including content creation and brand partnerships, without visiting the locations their avatars are pictured in.
- ▪AI influencers like Mia Metaverse can generate content around the clock, providing continuous value to brands and creators.
- ▪These digital influencers are being recognized in new award categories, such as the AI Personality of the Year, highlighting their growing cultural impact.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Tech exclusive AI influencer salaries revealed, with one making $9k-a-month — but which has he most personality? By Jeanette Settembre Published May 16, 2026, 5:00 a.m. ET Non-humans aren’t eligible for the real-life Academy Awards, so the AI Personality of the year awards has been set up. Four of the creators behind top AI nominees – who are created as a British model, a Mexican DJ, a Polish athlete and a Indian film star – told The Post how managing their creations is a full time job. However, they don’t even get to visit the exotic locales their pristinely-groomed, camera-ready globe-trotting hot bots are pictured in.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at New York Post.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from New York Post
