WeSearch

Agentically optimizing LLM prompt cache TTLs for fun and profit

·10 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 18 views
#technology#artificial intelligence#cost optimization
Agentically optimizing LLM prompt cache TTLs for fun and profit
⚡ TL;DR · AI summary

Firetiger has implemented a system to optimize the time-to-live (TTL) settings for prompt caching in their large language model (LLM) agents. By utilizing an automated agent, they achieved a 77% reduction in waste associated with overly long TTLs. This process involved analyzing telemetry data and making iterative adjustments to improve performance and reduce costs.

Key facts
Original article
The Firetiger Blog
Read full at The Firetiger Blog →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Agentically optimizing LLM prompt cache TTLs for fun and profit By Rustam Lalkaka — 18 May 2026 A case study on production objective hill climbingFiretiger runs a few hundred large language model (LLM) agents in production, and prompt caching is a critical tool to manage the cost of running such a workload. Properly setting cache time-to-live (TTL), how long a cached prefix survives before the next request pays full price again, is critical to reaping maximum benefit from prompt caching. The catch: the "right" TTL is a property of the workload, and not something you can intuit up front.Case in point: we were quietly burning spend on cache writes that cost more to write than they ever saved us on read.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The Firetiger Blog.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from The Firetiger Blog