A Theology Against Culture Warring
The article critiques the adversarial nature of culture wars and advocates for 'principled accommodation' as a more constructive way for people of differing beliefs to coexist. The authors argue that pluralism should not be seen as weakness or compromise but as a necessary condition for civil discourse in a diverse society. They propose a theological framework that emphasizes humility, dialogue, and mutual respect over ideological domination.
- ▪The authors promote 'principled accommodation' as a better alternative to culture warring.
- ▪They argue that pluralism is essential for civil discourse and should not be viewed as capitulation.
- ▪The piece is co-authored by Michael Reneau, Thomas B. Griffith, and Joshua M. Topham, all of whom have backgrounds in law, theology, and public discourse.
- ▪The article appears in Dispatch Faith, a newsletter exploring religion and faith in public life.
- ▪The authors suggest a theological basis for engaging differences with humility and respect.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Dispatch Faith A Theology Against Culture Warring Why ‘principled accommodation’ provides a better way to disagree. Michael Reneau, Thomas B. Griffith, & Joshua M. Topham / May 17, 2026 Loading Audio Turn any article into a podcast. Upgrade now to start listening. Text Size Members can share articles with friends & family to bypass the paywall. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Threads Email 0 Open and scroll to the comments section You’re reading Dispatch Faith, our weekly newsletter exploring the biggest stories in religion and faith. To unlock the full version, become a Dispatch member today. Hi and happy Sunday. “Pluralism” often is treated as a dirty word.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The Dispatch.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from The Dispatch
